It is up to you and your landlord to agree on the duration of the lease. To be able to use this interruption clause, your landlord must inform you in writing for at least 2 months during the first 4 months of the lease. For more information on this topic, please see our guide to check if your lease is good or not. The basic principle behind an AST – and probably why it is called secure – is that it offers the tenant some security of ownership, subject to certain restrictions. In other words, as long as the tenant pays the rent and complies with the terms of the lease, he has the right to stock up for the agreed period – or “duration”, as it is called. Operating expenses by law This is when the tenant renounces the use of the property to the owner and the owner who accepts it. This could mean that the tenant will hand over the keys to the property to the landlord and the landlord will agree that the contract is over and that he now has the property. You have the right to know the contact details of your landlord, whether the property is managed by a rental agent. If this information is not included in the agreement, do not sign until it is provided. This blog post discusses information that should be considered by both landlords and tenants before entering an AST. It also deals with frequently asked questions and situations that arise during a lease. When the temporary period expires, the lessor can either grant the tenant another temporary AST (provided he wishes to do so) or continue the lease for months. In this case, it becomes a periodic lease – see later for more information about it.
It is a legal contract between the lessor and the tenant that sets the conditions of a lease, such as for example. B the duration of the contract and the amount of rent to be paid by the tenant. I am sorry to have responded slowly to the September 16 posts, but the Artesian Residential case predated the coming into force of the Human Rights Act in 1998, so there was no debate about treaty rights. Otherwise, Ground 8 should have, or at least, given up an incompatibility with Section 1 of the First Protocol in the Housing Act 1988. There is also a logical error in the argument that, because forfeiture is not possible, since the law provides for an alternative method of terminating a lease, an application for exemption from forfeiture is also impossible. . . .